Contact AUD      Contribute to AUD      About AUD       Sign up for updates     Site index     Search this website     Request help

Home Legal Rights Education Union Democracy Review Books

AUDLinks

Union Democracy Review -- selected articles


Tell a friend about this article

Previous Article: Relentless attack on democracy in the Machinists Union

Next Article: IAM Local 2339N: Nasty aftermath to a Trusteeship


This article is here only because others like you -- unionists who understand the importance of democracy in our unions and our countries -- contribute to AUD.

Please give what you can.

AUDHome--> Union Democracy Review--> Articles

SUBSCRIBE to Union Democracy Review!

From the November-December 2008 issue of Union Democracy Review #176

Free Speech in the SEIU and MEBA?

Anything you say will be used against you

Be careful if you want to run for office in SEIU Local 521. Be sure to apologize for putting the local to the expense of conducting an election, and say only nice things about your incumbent rivals. You say we are exaggerating? Maybe so. But it's best to be on the safe side. (Think of what they did to Sal Rosselli. After saying some unpleasant things about International President Andy Stern, he faced a multitude of charges before trial committees appointed by Stern, and the 150,000-member local he heads faces the double threat of trusteeship or dissolution.) Yes, it is better to be safe. Here is what candidates for chapter office in Local 521 are under pressure to sign:

"I believe that negative campaigns contribute no positive value to a democratic political process. Personal attacks and misrepresentation of facts only fuel cynicism and apathy within our union membership. I believe I can win this election by running a positive campaign and focusing on the merits of my candidacy. This is the way my campaign will be run throughout the election…. I will run a campaign that reflects positively on our union and our members. I will not defame or personally attack my fellow union members. In short, I will conduct my campaign in a respectful and responsible manner."

What penalty will the local inflict on candidates whom it decides irresponsibly lacked respect? Not clear? But the threat of punishment is there, vague but ominous.

This "pledge" has everything upside down. The problem in the SEIU is not that members lack respect for officers but that SEIU top leaders have displayed too much respect for local officers whom they appointed and who went on to misappropriate hundreds of thousands of dollars from the union treasury, creating a scandal so embarrassing that the union has appointed a high-level commission to figure out ways to avoid a repetition. If anything, Local 521 might demand that candidates show respect for the union treasury and pledge to avoid a financial conflict of interest by stealing union money.

Using the internet?
Beware, you could be a criminal!

To be fair, we can understand why SEIU Local 521 incumbents might need reassurance and gentle treatment. They all originally got their posts by appointment when the local was created by merger, and so they are not accustomed to vigorous election challenge. But the officers of a seafarers' union, the Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, have no such excuse. They emerged out of a robust union democracy. Their union was shaped by a strong successful insurgent movement for democracy against a corrupt administration. As Matt Noyes reported in our previous issue, for twelve years under a reformed administration, the union maintained a website and online bulletin board service freely open to all members. For twelve years, subject to minimal censorship, it was an arena for lively discussion. Officers sometimes faced harsh criticism and replied in the same free-wheeling spirit. The discussion got along fine, even without the posting of formal guidelines. All that has changed. Now, under its incumbent administration, the MEBA came up with guidelines galore, carefully formulated for their obvious menacing, intimidating qualities. It's hard to believe, but critics are warned that if they violate these guidelines, they might face criminal charges! The ominous spirit of the whole thing leaps out of these typical comments:

"It is unlawful to include content considered objectionable…. Objectionable content is content which MEBA believes could legally leave the union open to liability or litigation…. MEBA will hold you solely responsible for any damages or expenses to/or incurred by MEBA, its affiliates, employees, members, businesses, or anyone else the violation is against…. MEBA reserves the right to remove such material from its servers, immediately terminate your account, and you may be subject to civil or criminal liability."

These warnings of looming disaster seem to have achieved their purpose. Marine Engineer Paul Norman reports, "The level of free and meaningful discourse has dropped to near zero."

Articles on the internet and union democracy:
Appeals court backs union curbs on the internet
Free Speech in the SEIU and MEBA?
Union officers uncomfortable with online free speech
Surrendering to the internet: Democrats in spite of themselves?

IBEW president Hill upholds Canadian member's rights
Union officials "condone and endorse" attack on member's internet free speech rights
Round 2 in the internet battle in AFSCME DC37
In AFSCME DC37 - A round in the internet battle
Danger of democracy on the Internet? Kill it!
Whose "IBEW" is it? An Electrician on the Internet.
Results of the 2005 AUD Best Rank-and-File Website Contest
Union democracy online survives two lawsuits
Online Guide: build an effective rank-and-file website
SEIU Pulls plug on "Labor's Future" discussion
52 Playing cards = fearsome "Local 52"
Using the Internet for Union Democracy

AUD's Best Rank-and-File Websites of 2004
Matt Noyes on AUD and the Internet
2KB of free speech? ACLU & Public Citizen sue in IBEW Local 46 election
Making a splash: SEIU's Unite to Win and the "free and open debate" on Labor's future

SAG officers unnerved by actors' internet free speech

Free speech irritates UFCW

Free speech in NWU
IATSE 600: Internet democracy triumphs over super centralization
Cyber-democracy: your legal rights online.(handout)

See also:
AUD's 50 Guidelines for building an effective rank-and-file website, and the sample homepage.
The labortech tag on del.icio.us.

 

back to top

Previous Article: Relentless attack on democracy in the Machinists Union

Next Article: IAM Local 2339N: Nasty aftermath to a Trusteeship

This website is made possible by contributions from union members and supporters like you. Please help us build the movement for union democracy, join or contribute to AUD.


AUDHome; Legal Rights; Education; Union Democracy Review; Books; AUDLinks

Page designed by Matt Noyes, National Writers Union/UAW, and Rachel Szekely
The Association for Union Democracy. www.uniondemocracy.org
104 Montgomery Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11225; USA; 718-564-1114; info@uniondemocracy.org

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Use the following credit line on the materials you use:
"From the website of the Association for Union Democracy. www.uniondemocracy.org. Email: info@uniondemocracy.org. 104 Montgomery Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11225; USA; 718-564-1114"

Please notify us at websteward@uniondemocracy.org when you use material from the site.

Send comments or suggestions on the website to websteward@uniondemocracy.org.