Internet exclusive.
(A shorter version of this piece appears in the January-February 2006
issue of Union Democracy Review #160)
Pipefitters,
feisty Canadians, and Pilots: results of AUD's Best Rank-and-File Website
Contest 2005
"The
GREAT contests for web sites run by LabourStart
and by the AUD are the "Oscar ceremonies" of the Labor Cyber
World." - Art
Shostak, author of CyberUnion and the CyberUnion Handbook.
Collaboration, free speech, "we are the media,"
online communities, the internet's long tail, self-organization... if
you want to see the new internet being built, the websites and blogs of
rank-and-file unionists are a great place to start. The large informal
network of rank-and-file and reform websites is a workshop for union democracy,
social software, and union regeneration.
AUD's annual Best Rank-and-File
Website Contest offers a tour of the work in progress. This year's contestants
reflect the richness and diversity of the rank-and-file web, the current
best practices, and some trends in its evolution.
AUD runs the annual Best
Rank-and-File Website Contest in order to:
spotlight the great work
that rank-and-file activists are doing and make their work known to
a broader audience,
promote the use of the
internet as an organizing tool for union reformers, and,
encourage discussion
among rank-and-file webstewards about best practices -- both technically
and in terms of organizing -- so we can all be more effective.
Sites were rated according
to AUD's "50
Guidelines for Building an Effective Rank-and-File Website" and
judged by a panel of experts in website and blog design, union democracy
law, and rank-and-file activism. This year we also held an experimental
online survey. (Note: contest results do not indicate AUD's endorsement
of the site's contents or sponsoring organizations/individuals. Sites
change frequently, to see them as they were at the time of the contest,
use the Wayback Machine.)
(Want to see how your website
measures up against our criteria? Do the website
self-diagnostic test on the "50 Guidelines for Building an Effective
Rank-and-File Website" page on the AUD website.)
And the
winners are:
First Place:
Pipe Trades for a Democratic Union (http://www.p4du.org/)
United Association of Plumbers and Pipefitters (UA).
"Well organized and intuitive."
The focus is on action at P4DU, home to the reform
group of the same name in the corruption-plagued UA. Effective design
and good editing enable P4DU to strike a balance between exposing the
corruption in the union and supporting the efforts of reformers at the
local and international level. P4DU formed at an AUD
building trades conference in 2002. With the UA
convention coming up in 2006, P4DU's top priority is the campaign
to elect Tommy Preuett General President of the UA.
Strengths:
Solid design. The home
page is well organized with a clear title and slogan, a nice logo and
a great use of space. Without scrolling down, a visitor can find the
main navigation and the top priority content items.
Clear priorities. Right
off the bat on the home page you find P4DU sharing information (about
corruption in the UA leadership, about members' legal rights, and about
local reform efforts), and organizing support for the Preuett Team.
Focus on action: information
about the "Preuett Team" is the lead item in the main column
on the home page, with links to the Preuett campaign site. (The Preuett
site is also well organized to get members involved).
Integrates contributions
from several members in different locals.
RSS on a static html
site. Syndication enables others to stay updated about changes to the
website and to add the information to their blogs. Blogs and CMS-based
websites include syndication by default, but P4DU has added an RSS feed
to an otherwise static HTML website using the open source program ListGarden.
Room for improvement:
The left navigation could
use a standard "About Us" link to basic information about
the group, in addition to the existing "Our Mission" link.
There should also be
a "Contact Us" page, ideally with names and emails of P4DU
supporters in different parts of the country (which are available elsewhere
on the site). A "Get Involved" page is also a good option,
(though the central table on the home page does this for the Preuett
campaign).
The Mission Statement
would be better if it had more specific and measurable benchmarks that
will enable members to see what P4DU members think needs to be done
and if progress is being made. See HEARDNY for an example http://www.heardny.org/main.htm
Labels. Some items in
the left navigation are unclearly labeled. "Members Sound Off"
sounds like it might lead to a forum, but the forum is elsewhere. Members
Sound Off leads to reports from local activists. Those reports deserve
more prominent billing. "Local Unions" suggests a list of
locals, maybe local websites, but leads to news from various locals.
Other labels are vague. What's the difference between "Labor Issues"
and "Education"? It would be better to either make the buttons
more specific and descriptive, or simplify the left navigation by creating
a few main sections and then listing high priority content from each
section under the navigation link.
The P4DU logo should
be on the top left, with a link to the home page, now the standard location/use
for website logos.
Forum. It would
be worth figuring out why the Forum has not taken off. Is there another
UA forum that is more active? If so, would it be better for P4DU people
to participate in that, and put a link on the P4DU page?
P4DU is a good candidate
for a Content
Management System makeover. P4DU could host blogs for the local activists,
do more with RSS feeds and news aggregation, use the registration process
to collect contact information for members, and get more people involved
in the website and the group.
Second Place: Members
for Democracy (http://www.ufcw.net/)
- Cross-union reform site. (Recently reincarnated as http://www.uncharted.ca
where there will soon be a MFD archive. To see the site as it was in 2005,
see the Wayback
Machine.)
"Solid and deep, with a union democracy
focus and an excellent toolkit."
The feisty Members for Democracy
(MFD) grew out of reform
efforts in UFCW local 1518, in British Columbia, but evolved into
an online community for union reformers in Canada and the US. The action
revolved around regularly updated front page articles and an active Open
Forum. MFD owes its success to its many active participants and solid
core group of contributors. MFD
has also played a key role in defending the democratic rights of unionists
online.
According
to one core supporter, "Although the website is administered
and moderated by just a few people, these few don't lead this community
in the old way we think of leadership. The community is built on shared
thought, reflections, and discussions. ...it is free flowing and adaptive
in nature and therein lies the strength of the community IMHO."
Strengths:
The writing. Punchy, provocative writing, with
a sense of humor.
Strong core group of
moderators and contributors.
Frequent interaction
between core contributors and other participants keeps the forum lively
and moves the discussions forward.
Strict posting guidelines
to keep discussion relatively civil.
Great forums section
with a simple and logical division of topics, including a well-used
Questions and Answers forum where workers write in with specific questions
about legal rights and reform organizing.
The toolkit featured
thoughtful pieces on grievances, duty of fair representation, the "tools
of disempowerment, unplugged" and more.
Room for improvement:
Inconsistent design.
The MFD home page and Open Forum shared a similar design sense and color
scheme and worked together dynamically. The blog-like front page articles
linked directly to forum discussions on those items; there was a list
of active topics, with icons representing hot topics and the number
of posts indicated; the forum discussions were quick moving.
On the other hand, the rest of the content listed in the main navigation
- The Trough, Weekly, Articles, Toolkit, Files and Documents - led to
pages with a completely different design and structure, even a different
logo, often without links to the forums.
Updates. "The trough"
- a fun feature that criticized union officers' salaries - seemed rarely
updated.
Labels. "Weekly"
and "Articles" were poorly named. What does "Weekly"
mean here? What articles are included in the "Articles" section,
all the articles on the site, including those on the front page?
User-unfriendly design.
"Files and documents" lead to a list of filenames that was
virtually incomprehensible.
MFD took honorable mention
in our last contest
and it may be that our criteria have finally caught up to them. We had
felt that MFD's broad focus and general audience made it less effective
as an organizing vehicle. But the internet is creating new forms of union
participation, including the type of online reform community that MFD
is building.
Third Place: APA Pilots
Defending the Profession. (http://www.apapdp.org/cms/)
Allied Pilots Association.
"Crucial, in the thick of things, helping members"
Pilots Defending the Profession is the vehicle for
American Airlines Pilots who feel their beleaguered union needs new strategies
and new leadership, immediately. PDP "leads from below" by providing
thorough industry and union analysis, promoting alternative strategy,
and organizing supporters. Not a union democracy focused site, per se,
but an example of members using their democratic rights to try to turn
their union, and industry, around.
Strengths:
Clear, consistent design.
PDP uses Mambo, a Content
Management System, to good effect. It is easy to find your way around
the site and while there is a lot of information it is well-organized.
List of "PDP Supporters"
by name, job, union experience, is a good feature - shows depth of support
and experience and willingness of PDP supporters to speak out. Would
be nice to have designated people to contact. "Sign up to support
PDP" leads to a well-designed form that members can use to add
their names to the list.
Detailed contract analysis
covering pay, sick leave, recognition, furlough pay, and more. Pay comparisons
across airlines, including inflation adjusted pay rate analysis.
Weekly editorials. These
should get more prominence on the home page and be linked to the forums
for discussion.
Room for improvement:
Colors add interest and
help the navigation, but the contrast is too low: orange type on a grey
background is an unnecessary burden on the reader.
Unused space at the top
of the home page. On an information rich site like this, space is precious.
The space given over to title, photo, slogan, should be used more efficiently.
Contract Analysis should
give user more upfront information about the contents; the first page
makes it look like it is just pay comparison, which is already in a
section of its own.
Too much news. No need
to list "Industry News" in the center table, it is listed
in the right column and on a page linked to the main navigation. That
is enough. Save the crucial home page space for content that is original
to PDP, and for top priority content.
Bad format for list of
items. Listing industry news and other items as unbroken paragraphs
separated by semi-colons is a bad idea. Nobody wants to read this:
"Industry News: Bankruptcy Judge Allows
Northwest Airlines to Freeze Pilot Pension Plan; Northwest Pilots
Authorize Strike Vote; Northwest Traffic Continues to Plummet; Delta
Air Lines Traffic Falls 4.5 Percent in January As Capacity Declines;
Judge Orders Delta to Pay $2 Million Monthly; Delta Ask Court For
permission to Reinstate Severance Packages; Retired Pilots to Have
Say in Delta Restructuring; Delta Pilots to Open Strike Center in
Atlanta; Delta Pilots to Strike if Contract Nixed; JetBlue Announces
Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2005 Results; Continental Airlines
Officers Surrender Restricted Stock Awards; US District Courts Rules
Bankruptcy Court Lacked Authority to Cancel United Pilots' Pension;
BA Pilots Set to Take Action Over Pensions; Mesaba Labor Groups
React to 1113(c) Filing to Reject Contracts; Virgin America Appoints
Donald J. Carty Chairman of its Board of Directors"
Focus. Center of home
page should be dedicated to pdp original content and on key docs and
resources, the Special Updates, or example, deserve more attention.
APDP shows how unionists can use the web to provide
education, information, and leadership in our out of union office.
Members for a Stronger Local Union (and its freestanding
forum - Union Voices http://www.unionvoices.org/)
is dedicated to member participation, with a focus on union meetings and
bylaws reform. The site provides key information -- the IBEW constitution,
local bylaws, and union referral rules -- and reports on the progress
of its efforts. The list of supporters is a good feature as is the description
of "our plans for the near future."
Room for improvement: the website has a clear focus
on democracy and participation but is weak on strategic goals - democracy
for what? The link to information on Robert's Rules is a good idea but
too technical to be of much use. Better to link to something like the
10
Points for Meetings (pdf) published by the CAW. Better yet, provide
a question and answer feature so that people can learn the ins and outs
of Robert's Rules before going to the union meeting. The low contrast
visuals of the Forum on the Union Voices site are hard on the eyes.
The survey
results.
This year, AUD conducted
an online survey in addition to the judged contest. Out of 46 replies
the top three sites were:
JD Walker's Website. http://clix.to/jdinpgh
"JD has worked very diligently to try to keep the members of the
ATU informed, while facing much resistance and without proper support.
One of the only places where members can get the truth about the ATU/Greyhound
situation..."
The Laborers.net. http://www.thelaborers.net/
"This site benefits all union members! If you can't find it there,
it is probably not available yet! Contact Jim McGough and he will find
a way to get it! Thanks Jim
Syndication. An RSS/ATOM
feed is a great browsing tool that also helps network websites.
As blogs and CMS spread, feeds will become a basic feature of websites.
It is possible to add an RSS feed to a regular HTML site, using programs
like the free, open source, ListGarden.
FAQs. Rail Operating Crafts United (ROCU) uses
FAQs very effectively to explain the group's mission and strategy
and respond to questions.
Blog in action. The Independent
Community of Educators, ICE-UFT played an important role in the
intense debate on the UFT contract negotiations and ratification vote
this fall, sharing information and opinion and distributing leaflets.
ICE-UFT also helped bring the debate into the official union blog Edwize.
Here's my card. Factory Rats Unite!
has a pdf
file of cards to download and print, with the site URL and a list
of topics that the site covers. Great way to promote the site and get
contacts.
Show your work. Future of the Union uses
photos
and video clips of mass meetings and protest actions to put the
emphasis on organizing and action.
Campaign kit. Future of the Union also uses a "campaign
kit" of flyers, stickers, buttons, and t-shirts.
Trends
General and cross-union
sites. There were more sites aimed at a broad union audience this year
(as opposed to a single local or international union), including KCLabor,
Members for Democracy, and Working Life, as well as cross-union sites
that aim at a given industry or sector: New York City Workers, and Rail
Operating Crafts United.
More Blogs and CMS. In the
2004 contest there were no blogs and just one site using a Content Management
System (Members for Democracy). This year, nearly one third of the sites
used blog or CMS software.
Blog software used: Wordpress
(2), Typepad (1), and Blogger (1). CMS software: Mambo (2), PHP Nuke (2),
Drupal (1), Coranto (1), Plone (1).
Traditional html websites
are still in the majority (sites using Frontpage outnumbered blogs and
CMS together), but the ease of use, good basic design, and interactivity
of blogs and CMS will likely make them the most popular tool for rank-and-file
activism online. Blogs will probably multiply fastest. Said one judge,
"if I were consulting with people today, I would tell them to explore
the blog packages. They provide a good and free built-in interface for
sites that are a good starter and are easy (well, easier) to maintain."
(The default interface can also raise design problems, especially for
sites aimed at organizing for union democracy. See Jakob
Nielsen on weblog usability and AUD's 50
Guidelines.)
This website
is made possible by contributions from union members and supporters like
you. Please help us build the movement for union democracy, join
or contribute to AUD.
Use
the following credit line on the materials you use: "From the
website of the Association for Union Democracy. www.uniondemocracy.org. Email:
info@uniondemocracy.org. 104 Montgomery Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11225; USA;
718-564-1114"