|
Contact AUD Join AUD About AUD Sign up for updates Site index Search this website Request help |
| Home | Legal Rights | Education | Union Democracy Review | Books |
| Union Democracy Review -- selected articles |
|
Tell a friend about this article Previous Article: Reform breakthrough in Ohio IUOE Local 18 Next Article: SEIU pulls plug on Future of Labor discussion |
AUDHome--> Union Democracy Review--> Articles SUBSCRIBE to Union Democracy Review! From the September-October 2005 issue of Union Democracy Review #158 Fifty-two playing cards = fearsome "Local 52"To appreciate this story, remember that 52 cards make a deck (except for pinochle's 48.) From that obscure fact arises an imaginary Local 52... A group of members of the International Chemical Workers Union at the Colgate-Palmolive plant in Jeffersonville, IN, writes that, "Unhappy with our Local's officers..., Over the years, we have banded together informally to lobby for reform." They are represented by Local 15C. To ridicule them, the incumbent officers derisively dismissed them as the "Local 52 members," implying, not too subtly, that they were more interested in playing cards than in unionism. But the reformers were not bothered by this effort to derogate their activities. They defiantly assumed the name bestowed upon them; from then on they called their reform caucus "Local Fifty-Two." They popularized their adopted caucus name on their new website and emblazoned it proudly on their T-shirts. On September 2 came this threatening letter from Robert W. Lowery, who identifies himself as the assistant General Counsel for the UFCW as well as counsel for the Chemical Workers.
Apart from its content, this message is significant for its origin. The Chemical Workers and its Local 15C are affiliates of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union. The lawyer-author writes, not as the representative of the local, but as assistant general counsel for the UFCWU. So this message comes from way up high. The UFCWU is part of the Change to Win coalition which stakes a claim as a great reform movement. Obviously, one thing that it does not propose to reform or to change is the prevailing bureaucratic mood that infects wide sections of the labor movement. In a letter addressed to Larry Gregoire, Chemical Workers international president, who had mailed a similar letter, Ryan Compton replies for the Local Fifty-Two reformers: His group, he writes,
Articles
on the internet and union democracy: See
also: Previous Article: Reform breakthrough in Ohio IUOE Local 18 Next Article: SEIU pulls plug on Future of Labor discussion This website is made possible by contributions from union members and supporters like you. Please help us build the movement for union democracy, join or contribute to AUD. AUDHome; Legal Rights; Education; Union Democracy Review; Books; AUDLinks Page designed by Matt Noyes, National
Writers Union/UAW, and Rachel Szekely
Use
the following credit line on the materials you use: Please notify us at websteward@uniondemocracy.org when you use material from the site. Send comments or suggestions on the website to websteward@uniondemocracy.org. |